Principle: Documented Plurality of Users (principle 9)
- Open (principle 1)
- Common Format (principle 2)
- URI/Identifier Space (principle 3)
- Versioning (principle 4)
- Scope (principle 5)
- Textual Definitions (principle 6)
- Relations (principle 7)
- Documentation (principle 8)
- Documented Plurality of Users (principle 9)
- Commitment To Collaboration (principle 10)
- Locus of Authority (principle 11)
- Naming Conventions (principle 12)
- Maintenance (principle 16)
- Responsiveness (principle 20)
The ontology developers should document that the ontology is used by multiple independent people or organizations.
This principle aims to ensure that the ontology tackles a relevant scientific area and does so in a usable and sustainable fashion.
It is important to be able to illustrate usage outside of the immediate circle of ontology developers and stakeholders. An ontology that has not been used by other than the developer(s) is not yet ready for review. Note that the ontology can still be listed in other ontology portals such as the OBO Library while publicising your resource in appropriate channels and searching for users with needs you can meet.
The ontology developers should provide links/citations to evidence of use (publication, external ontology; see examples below) as input to the review process.
Use of the target ontology’s term IRIs in other ontologies. This can be evidenced by linking to the other ontology that uses an ontology term IRI from this ontology
Imports in other ontologies, again, evidenced through a link to the importing ontology
A documentation page with links to databases using the ontology for annotation
Use in semantic web projects (e.g., Open PHACTS usage)
Use in diverse software applications, including text mining or analysis pipelines
Publications showing the ontology being used in research (evidenced by citation details for the publications; if behind paywall it may be necessary to provide a PDF for the paper)
Citations to the ontology publication(s); such citations are only relevant if the authors indicate actual use of the cited ontology within some community (mere mention of the existence is not enough to warrant inclusion)
Documentation of requests from multiple users, e.g., via an issue tracker (provide a link to the issue tracker online)
Use of the terms from the ontology to structure or annotate experimental or derived data (e.g. GOA; provide details of how to review the annotations)
Mere mention of the existence of an ontology in a publication is not enough to count as evidence of usage
Criteria for Review
To pass review, the ontology developers must demonstrate at least three external users. External users are defined either as researchers not significantly overlapping in personnel with the developers or three independent groups with three independent artefacts (db, etc) that use the ontology.